[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Re: unnumbered subsections in latex export

From: Nick Dokos
Subject: Re: [O] Re: unnumbered subsections in latex export
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:00:00 -0400

Jambunathan K <address@hidden> wrote:

> >> For example, I don't know if the docbook backend explicitly
> >> writes section numbers in, or if the sectioning is left to the
> >> stylesheet.  If the latter, can I mark sections as ones that
> >> should be numbered and ones that shouldn't?
> >> 
> >
> > And I'm sure Jambunathan will take care of the odt exporter.
> I think from odt side of things users are very likely to turn off
> numbering and toc altogether and be more than happy to give finishing
> touches with automatic outline numbering facility and automatic toc
> generation facility offered by the viewers.
> Currently the TOC and section-numbering generated by the odt exporter is
> artificial. i.e., It looks like section numbers and TOC but the
> underlying xml elements are not spitted out by the odt exporter.
> Considering that the odt exporter is new I believe there is some
> flexibility on my side to reject certain features as too niche for a
> first level release :-).

Of course: if somebody needs the functionality, they implement it and
submit it - that's open source in a nutshell.

OTOH, it is important to document such limitations, so that innocent
users don't end up spending hours trying to do something that cannot
be done. 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]