[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Re: unnumbered subsections in latex export
From: |
Eric S Fraga |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Re: unnumbered subsections in latex export |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:27:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Aankhen <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> Thank you for the clarifications. I’m going to talk a bit more about
> HTML as that’s where I have the most experience. I am in agreement
> with you when you say that builtin support for acronyms would be
> useful (although I feel it would be good to generalize it to
> abbreviations, if that can also be supported in other backends). When
> you have the following markup:
>
> ,----
> | <acronym title="Hypertext Markup Language">HTML</acronym> is a
> | language for marking up documents. The most current version
> | of <acronym title="Hypertext Markup Language">HTML</acronym> is 4.01.
> | The successor to <acronym title="Hypertext Markup
> | Language">HTML</acronym>, HTML5, is currently under development.
> `----
>
> The expansion is invisible by default; it shows up in a tooltip when
> you hover over the text. You can try a live example to see for
> yourself.[1] In this way, the expansion is always there when you need
> it (and you can distinguish between multiple terms sharing the same
> acronym, should the need ever arise), but it takes up no space if you
> don’t.
There are those of us that, for one reason or another, do *not* use a
mouse or any other graphical pointer. Tooltips do not appear ever in
those cases. I would like a solution that does not rely on any
particular graphical interface paradigm, basically!
Of course, I know that I am in the minority here... but accessibility is
always an important factor and one that should not be ignored, IMO.
> I would suggest that, were Org to gain support for acronyms and/or
> abbreviations, they be exported in HTML using ‘abbr’ (‘acronym’ is
> deprecated thanks to HTML5) with the ‘title’ defined for each
> occurrence, and with CSS to ensure consistent rendering, along these
> lines:
>
> ,----
> | abbr { font-variant: small-caps; border-bottom: 1px dashed; cursor: help; }
> `----
Does this still rely on tooltips?
> I can see the argument for having a list at the end and linking each
> definition instead. I feel that’s less convenient, however, as (a) it
> means temporarily losing your place in the document and (b) bunched-up
> anchors at the end of a document are a pain. Of course,
> alternatively, each acronym/abbreviation could be marked up only at
> the first occurrence; that seems like it would be easy to implement as
> a configuration option.
I would like a combination of both, whenever possible: fully expanded
def'n in the text at the first occurrence and links to the list of
abbreviations/acronyms at the end for subsequent occurrences (modulo the
problems with double-links etc, for which I cannot propose a solution
unfortunately).
Thanks,
eric
--
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1
: using Org-mode version 7.5 (release_7.5.134.gb869b)
- [O] Re: unnumbered subsections in latex export, (continued)
[O] Re: unnumbered subsections in latex export, Jambunathan K, 2011/04/01
[O] Re: unnumbered subsections in latex export, Achim Gratz, 2011/04/01
[O] Re: unnumbered subsections in latex export, Sébastien Vauban, 2011/04/04
[O] Re: unnumbered subsections in latex export, Matt Lundin, 2011/04/06