[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [Patch] Documentation, was Re: Spurious source-code output?
From: |
Thomas S. Dye |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [Patch] Documentation, was Re: Spurious source-code output? |
Date: |
Thu, 5 May 2011 09:31:09 -1000 |
Ack. There were problems earlier with my Mac Mail client and line
breaks, IIRC, but here is the patch in-line. I'm not sure how to make
attachments follow specific MIME requirements.
All the best,
Tom
From 825fe69d493dd2e7eef414b85340e8e27400f78d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Dye <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 08:24:24 -1000
Subject: [PATCH] Refer to language specific Babel header arguments
---
doc/org.texi | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/org.texi b/doc/org.texi
index 7142ce0..98842ba 100644
--- a/doc/org.texi
+++ b/doc/org.texi
@@ -11885,6 +11885,9 @@ The following header arguments are defined:
* eval:: Limit evaluation of specific code
blocks
@end menu
+Additional header arguments are defined on a language-specific basis,
see
address@hidden
+
@node var, results, Specific header arguments, Specific header
arguments
@subsubsection @code{:var}
The @code{:var} header argument is used to pass arguments to code
blocks.
--
1.7.1
On May 5, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Thomas S. Dye <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi Nick,
Thanks for fixing the documentation link.
Here is a patch that adds a reference to language-specific header
arguments.
I think it's still the case that attachments of MIME type
application/octet-stream will not be recorded in patchwork. Please
use
one of the types that patchwork will recognize (text/plain is the
best -
remember the Orgmode motto!) or just insert it inline.
See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/25727.
I'll add a note to that effect to org-contribute.html on Worg
unless somebody tells me otherwise.
Nick
- [O] Spurious source-code output?, Ken.Williams, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] Spurious source-code output?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] Spurious source-code output?, Ken.Williams, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] Spurious source-code output?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] Spurious source-code output?, Thomas S. Dye, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] Spurious source-code output?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/05
- [O] [Patch] Documentation, was Re: Spurious source-code output?, Thomas S. Dye, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] [Patch] Documentation, was Re: Spurious source-code output?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] [Patch] Documentation, was Re: Spurious source-code output?,
Thomas S. Dye <=
- Re: [O] [Patch] Documentation, was Re: Spurious source-code output?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] [Patch] Documentation, was Re: Spurious source-code output?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] [Patch] Documentation, was Re: Spurious source-code output?, Eric Schulte, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] [Patch] Documentation, was Re: Spurious source-code output?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/05