[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] latex checkboxes

From: Nicolas Goaziou
Subject: Re: [O] latex checkboxes
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:18:46 +0200


Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:

> Yes, you can indeed - except for the [-] which is hardcoded. Try the
> following:
> #LATEX_HEADER: \setbox0=\hbox{\large$\square$}
> #+BIND: org-export-latex-list-parameters (:cbon 
> "[{\\parbox[][][c]{\\wd0}{\\large$\\boxtimes$}}]" :cboff 
> "[{\\parbox[][][c]{\\wd0}{\\large$\\square$}}]")
> * DONE Organize party [3/4]
>        - [ ] call people
>        - [X] order food
>        - [-] think about what music to play
>        - [X] talk to the neighbors
> So the question is: why is the [-] hardcoded?

Historical reasons, I guess.

I've now pushed a patch introducing the new property `:cbtrans' for
those check-boxes. Sadly, it will only work with exporters making use of
list parsing, that is only the LaTeX exporter so far.

Btw, is there any consensus on better default values for :cbon, :cboff
and :cbtrans? Configurability isn't an excuse for ugly standards.


Nicolas Goaziou

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]