Re: [O] [PATCH] Fix renumbering for footnotes at BOL.

[Tassilo Horn]

Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

> It looks like the original function isn't right in more than one way
> (it doesn't even make sure the matched string is really a
> footnote). But that's another topic.

Yes, indeed.

> About your patch, I have but one question: I don't get a situation in
> which the assert would be triggered, may you give me such an example?

I don't either, and that's a good thing.  I added that just as some
extra paranoia so that you get an error if a footnote gets broken.

Bye,
Tassilo