[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

From: Daniel Bausch
Subject: Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:41:20 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.0.6-gentoo; KDE/4.6.5; i686; ; )

Am Mittwoch 26 Oktober 2011, 15:10:03 schrieb Giovanni Ridolfi:
> Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
> > Eric Schulte <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> Surprisingly (to me) srcname is the winner here, but luckily I haven't
> >> yet voted, and although I would have though #+source: would have been
> >> the winner I like the simplicity of using #+name: for named code blocks
> >> as well as named data.  So I'll vote for #+name: here making it a tie,
> >> and I'll also take tie-breaking powers upon myself giving #+name: the
> >> win.
> > 
> > This is going to cost you, Schulte! It's not going to go down that
> > easily. I'll call the FTC, the FCC, the SCOTUS, the POTUS, the NYT, the
> > BDFL, the NFL and the MLB: an outrage I tell you! An affront to the
> > democratic rules some of us cherish! We'll fight to the death! Who's
> > with me?
> +1 srcname
> :-)
> Power to the people! Democracy forever!
> Giovanni /who has not used babel yet.

Hmm, then you don't know what we are talking about and should abstain from 
voting. ;-)
Daniel (who used Babel to write his thesis in one big file with all data and 
chart generating code interleaved with the text -- faboulous!)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]