[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] [PATCH] Make org-[beginning|end]-of-line respect visual-line-mod

From: Toby Cubitt
Subject: Re: [O] [PATCH] Make org-[beginning|end]-of-line respect visual-line-mode
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 18:27:04 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 06:02:40PM +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Toby Cubitt <address@hidden> writes:
> > org-beginning-of-line uses org-beginning-of-visual-line when
> > line-move-visual is enabled. I'm not sure if line-mode-visual can be
> > disabled when visual-line-mode is enabled. If so, org-beginning-of-line
> > should maybe test for either line-mode-visual *or* visual-line-mode.
> `beginning-of-visual-line' either set locally `line-move-visual' to t or
> use `vertical-motion', which doesn't care about `lime-move-visual'
> value. Thus, as one could expect, `line-move-visual' has no effect on
> horizontal scrolling.
> IMO, checking this variable is a no-op.

I'm confused. Which variable are you talking about here?

Anyway, I see that `visual-line-mode's sets `line-move-visual' to t
buffer-locally. So checking only `line-move-visual' in
`org-beginning-of-line' is fine...

...which strongly suggests that the recent fix to `org-end-of-line' is
wrong. Shouldn't it also be checking `line-move-visual' and not
`visual-line-mode', like `org-beginning-of-line'?

> Btw, if you plan to patch this area, could you provided tests for it
> (see test-org/end-of-line in test-org.el)? As I can testify, there is
> a high risk of regression in that area.

Thanks, I'll try to remember. Though I have no plans to patch anything
else in this area.

Dr T. S. Cubitt
Mathematics and Quantum Information group
Department of Mathematics
Complutense University
Madrid, Spain

email: address@hidden
web:   www.dr-qubit.org

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]