[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Sexp aganda entries broken?

From: Nicolas Goaziou
Subject: Re: [O] Sexp aganda entries broken?
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:24:33 +0100

Simon Thum <address@hidden> writes:

> I know that, but I deemed it useful to document it as a related but
> separate mechanism on its own merit. Perhaps there could be a link to
> 10.3.1 to make it clear that the notations differ in important ways?

Since %%(...) syntax isn't a timestamp /per se/, there is no reason to
refer to it in the timestamps part of the manual.

Also, despite its own merit, it's an antiquated[fn:1] and irregular
syntax, which doesn't deserve much publicity. It won't disappear, but
it's better to circumvent its uses.


[fn:1] Even the example given in "Calendar/Diary integration" section is
outdated, as it relies on CATEGORY keyword to change category on the fly
within the same section (see footnote in 10.4.1).

Nicolas Goaziou

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]