[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] "Generic" Source block language specification?

From: Nicolas Goaziou
Subject: Re: [O] "Generic" Source block language specification?
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 01:28:37 +0100


Jambunathan K <address@hidden> writes:

> Rainer M Krug <address@hidden> writes:
>> Hi
>> I have in a document a definition of a projection, which is essentially a 
>> text as follow:
>> #+BEGIN_src
>>   +proj=aea +lat_1=-28.25
>>           +lat_2=-29.75
>>           +lat_0=29
>>           +lon_0=30.75
>>           +x_0=0
>>           +y_0=0
>>           +datum=WGS84
>>           +units=m
>>           +no_defs
>> #+END_src
>> Now this does obviously not export, as the source block language is missing. 
>> Is there a way that I
>> can get the same formating of the source in the exportes output but without 
>> the syntax highlighting?
>> is similar, but I would like the block to be formated as the SRC
>> blocks.
> Marking the src block as `fundamental' has a drawback.  One can no
> longer have in-buffer fontification of src blocks.
> A better option would be to have a custom variable which produces
> black-and-white src blocks on export.  
> ODT already has this option.
>     C-h v org-e-odt-fontify-srcblocks RET
> I am CCing Nicolas, to check whether he would be interested in
> introducing an export knob for this.

I still don't get what is wrong with example blocks (wrt export). Would
someone care to elaborate?


Nicolas Goaziou

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]