[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] org-capture vs. org-agenda-capture
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] org-capture vs. org-agenda-capture |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:24:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Dear Rene,
Rene <address@hidden> writes:
> As a matter of fact, when called from the agenda `%U' doesn't expand as the
> current timestamp but rather provides the date of the line your point is on.
Depends. From the agenda, you can use either org-capture directly, or
org-agenda-capture. org-capture will convert %U using current time, not
the time of the agenda line -- unless `org-capture-use-agenda-date' is t.
> Wouldn't it be more convenient to get the current timestamp anyway?
If you want the date the cursor is on, I think 00:00 as a default time
makes sense, mixing the current time and the date line would be confusing
IMHO.
> Suppose you would like to create a new appointment then
> 1. you view your agenda to see whether you're free on a particular date
> 2. you place the cursor on that date line
> 3. you invoke org-agenda-capture (hit `k' key) from there
>
> then a template such as this one
>
> ("a" "Appointment" entry (file+headline "~/gtd.org" "Inbox")
> "* APPT %?\n %^T\n Added: %U")
>
> would expand as
>
> * APPT Dentist
> <2012-12-25 Tue 18:00-19:00>
> Added: [2012-12-12 Wed 22:13]
>
> which makes sense; instead of
>
> * APPT Dentist
> <2012-12-25 Tue 18:00-19:00>
> Added: [2012-12-25 Wed 00:00]
>
> as it is today.
I guess M-x org-capture is enough here.
Best,
--
Bastien