[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD
From: |
Ista Zahn |
Subject: |
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:27:17 -0500 |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Jambunathan K <address@hidden> wrote:
> Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> It's important for two reasons: to keep a nice atmosphere on the list,
>> so that people feel comfortable asking stupid questions; and to let
>> other developers focus on their work (while you try to help newbies
>> with their problems). It would have been difficult for you to focus
>> on the ODT exporter or to Nicolas to focus on the new export engine
>> if I didn't put enough energy to maintain the whole beast.
>
> Last line is comical. It reminds me of name Dilbert, for reason I
> cannot fathom. The worth of managers is over-estimated, particularly
> when the estimation is done by managers themselves.
I dislike this kind of negativity, so I've added you to my spam filter. Bye bye.
-Ista
- [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Dominik, Carsten, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Carsten Dominik, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Samuel Wales, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Rainer Stengele, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Evan Misshula, 2013/02/12