[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:49:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Eric,
Eric S Fraga <address@hidden> writes:
> If there is a consensus on the list that I am going against some form of
> etiquette for this list, I am happy to change my settings. I have no
> interest in annoying people!
Accepting standard use of Mail-Followup-To on this list is fine.
Let see if someone directly impacted complains one day.
For Gnus users who find your MFT confusing, there is this option:
(setq message-use-mail-followup-to nil)
Thanks,
--
Bastien
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Thomas S. Dye, 2013/02/11
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Eric S Fraga, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Eric S Fraga, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Eric S Fraga, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD,
Bastien <=
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Bastien, 2013/02/12
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Eric S Fraga, 2013/02/11