[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Small syntax change for footnote definitions
From: |
Samuel Wales |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Small syntax change for footnote definitions |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:07:15 -0700 |
Thank you for asking the list.
Does this allow blank lines to separate paragraphs in inline footnote
definitions?
If so, it sounds very good.
I presume we can still do
===
1) a
b.
1) c
===
On 2/21/13, Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> wrote:
> I suggest to end a footnote definition at a headline, another footnote
> definition or *two* blank lines.
Samuel
--
The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it. ANYBODY
can get it. There is no hope without action.