On 10 March 2013 13:12, Achim Gratz
<address@hidden> wrote:
Jambunathan K writes:
> Emacs lisp has a manual of it's own. I don't see how Org export
> reference *cannot* end in Emacs.
I said that I'm expecting these references to become part of the
manual(s). I still expect that and will try to help it along, but it
doesn't necessarily need to take the exact sequence of events that I
envisioned.
I have to agree with Bastien that they do not really fit into the main
Org manual.
Providing them with Emacs (so that they are immediately available) is
a good thing in my mind, however I would put them as a separate
document similarly to how the Elisp manual is separate.
Regards,
Jon
> Bastien is doing what(ever) suits his whims and you are approving of
> it.
I haven't approved or disapproved anything. I have only stated the
plain fact that if my understanding of the future course of events is
incorrect, then my comment does not apply (and conversely, if it does,
then the issue I've stated needs to be dealt with).
> I disapprove of what you are doing, Achim.
You're welcome. (Sun Tzu, III/2)
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+