[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter

From: John Hendy
Subject: Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 19:28:51 -0500

On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Thomas S. Dye <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi John,
> John Hendy <address@hidden> writes:
>> Am I doing something wrong if this is the behavior I'm getting, or is
>> the documentation incorrect and I shouldn't be quoting these options?
> Nicolas cleaned up the attribute syntax recently.  Previously, quotes
> were needed and backslashes were escaped.  Now, quotes are not used and
> backslashes don't need to be escaped.  Multi-word options are fine
> without quotes.

Thanks, Tom. Having an issue, though. From what I've read/heard...
=:width= is used for all backends now? This seems to be indicated by
this pretty recent post as well:
- http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/68306

#+begin_quote Aaron Ecay

Eliminating subtleties is precisely the point of this change.  All(-ish)*
backends now use :width.

* As far as I’ve checked, HTML(+ derived backends) and LaTeX(+derived
backends).  If there are any that don’t, they should probably be patched
to do so as well.


Using #+attr_html :width 200px results in <img src="" :width 200px
alt="" /> for me.

Why isn't :width for html being parsed into width="200px" ?

:options width="200px" works properly... but then again, I thought we
did away with :options var="value" syntax.

Just trying to keep up!


> hth,
> Tom
> --
> Thomas S. Dye
> http://www.tsdye.com

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]