[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?
From: |
Rainer Stengele |
Subject: |
Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible? |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:21:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 |
Am 22.03.2013 15:58, schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> Hello,
>
> Rainer Stengele <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Another funny issue here is that for the test my exported subtree has
>> the tag :noexport:
>>
>> My setting is:
>>
>> org-export-exclude-tags is a variable defined in `ox.el'.
>> Its value is ("noexport")
>>
>> So the export shouldn't export that subtree shouldn't it?
> You're explicitly asking for a subtree export. There's no reason for the
> export framework to think it is smarter than you and prevent you from
> doing so.
>
> When exporting a subtree, the parser only looks at the contents of the
> top level headline, not at its tags.
>
>
> Regards,
>
Makes sense, thanks.
Rainer
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, (continued)
Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, John Hendy, 2013/03/21
Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/03/22
Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?,
Rainer Stengele <=