[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating
From: |
Rasmus |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package? |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:47:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
> OK, let me ask like this:
>
> Does anyone know about conflicts arising from loading wrapfig and rotating?
Their manuals doesn't mention anything, it seems. The internet
suggests that there might be between memoir and wrapfig, but I didn't
look into it as I don't know much about memoir.
> OK, so my proposal is
Note: I should be obvious that I prefer to load as little stuff be
default as possible. That is: I'm biased, but it's OK when everyone
knows.
> - to add the rotating package
> - do document that the tabu package is needed when specifying tabu
Note the package loading order might matter.
> - do document that amsmath in needed when generating a matrix
and subscripts. And sometimes math (e.g. align).
> The reasoning:
> - wrapfig and longtable have been in there for a long time, we want to
> avoid breaking existing files whenever possible
Assuming a mechanism exists that can detect when tabu is to be loaded
why only apply it there and not to the other optional packages?
> - rotating is needed for sideways stuff and does not do any harm
Alternative implementation exists, but they are of course not
supported by Org. Would they be in conflict? I doubt it.
> - somewhat arbitrarily I am drawing the line above the tabu package.
It does seem a bit arbitrary.
Bu people who feel strongly about not loading some stuff can change
default package alist so it's not a big issue.
–Rasmus
--
A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, (continued)
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/09/12
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Detlef Steuer, 2013/09/13
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/09/15
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Nicolas Girard, 2013/09/15
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/09/16
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?,
Rasmus <=
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Rainer M Krug, 2013/09/16
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/09/16
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/09/16
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Rasmus, 2013/09/16
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Andreas Leha, 2013/09/16
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2013/09/16
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/09/17
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Rasmus, 2013/09/17
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/09/18
- Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Rasmus, 2013/09/18