[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] ob-clojure.el alternative using nrepl
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] ob-clojure.el alternative using nrepl |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Oct 2013 17:54:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Oleh,
Oleh <address@hidden> writes:
> Current method of clojure evaluation is through slime.
> I couldn't get it to work, when I tried long ago.
> So I attach one that uses nrepl.
> Switching between the two should be as easy as using
>
> (require 'ob-clojure)
> or
> (require 'ob-clojure-nrepl).
Nice, something needed. I guess we should rather have an option for
this in ob-clojure.el, letting users decide whether they want to use
nrepl.el or slime, a sensible default being to use nrepl.el.
What do you think?
--
Bastien
- [O] ob-clojure.el alternative using nrepl, Oleh, 2013/10/03
- Re: [O] ob-clojure.el alternative using nrepl, Oleh, 2013/10/03
- Re: [O] ob-clojure.el alternative using nrepl,
Bastien <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [O] ob-clojure.el alternative using nrepl, Oleh, 2013/10/03
- Re: [O] ob-clojure.el alternative using nrepl, Eric Schulte, 2013/10/03
- Re: [O] ob-clojure.el alternative using nrepl, Oleh, 2013/10/03
- Re: [O] ob-clojure.el alternative using nrepl, Eric Schulte, 2013/10/03
- Re: [O] ob-clojure.el alternative using nrepl, Bastien, 2013/10/03
- Re: [O] ob-clojure.el alternative using nrepl, Eric Schulte, 2013/10/03
- Re: [O] ob-clojure.el alternative using nrepl, Oleh, 2013/10/04
- Re: [O] ob-clojure.el alternative using nrepl, Eric Schulte, 2013/10/04