[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[O] [RFC] About `org-export-with-\(fixed-width\|tables\)'
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
[O] [RFC] About `org-export-with-\(fixed-width\|tables\)' |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Dec 2013 21:36:24 +0100 |
Hello,
At the moment, `org-export-with-fixed-width' and
`org-export-with-tables' (or their OPTIONS equivalent ::t and |:t) are
broken when not set to their default value. Also, "fixing" them is not
trivial. I think this is a good time to ponder about their usefulness.
Indeed, I don't think anyone would want to remove tables (or fixed-width
areas) from Org syntax. These variables were probably written because
tables and fixed-width can occasionally get in the way, on very specific
lines.
However, Org already provides ways to work around such problems. For
example, a table can be wrapped within an example block, or an offending
line can start with \vert instead of "|".
Therefore, in today's Org, they don't make much sense anymore. As
a consequence, I'd like to either:
1. Remove them completely from code base;
2. Change their meaning so they behave like `org-export-with-toc' or
`org-export-with-tags', that is: when `org-export-with-tables' is
set to nil, all tables are ignored during export.
I don't think option 2 is really useful, but I don't mind either way.
WDYT?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- [O] [RFC] About `org-export-with-\(fixed-width\|tables\)',
Nicolas Goaziou <=