[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Clojure Code Block Results not Tabularized
From: |
Soapy Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Clojure Code Block Results not Tabularized |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:06:20 -0500 |
Yes, I agree the Clojure behavior is not quite correct. But all the
functionality is there if both the old and new are combined. I think
only a rearrangement of existing code is required.
I like the idea of comparing to the behavior of Python code blocks.
I've got a Coursera class coming up which will use Python, so I need to
get it set it up here.
Thank you for the assistance!
Greg
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 13:58 +0100, Christian Moe wrote:
> Soapy Smith writes:
>
> > Christian, could you try :results table with Python and reply back with
> > the #+RESULTS:?
>
> Same as the default, i.e. a table, as expected.
> #+RESULTS:
> | 1 | 2 | 3 |
>
> The Babel/Clojure behavior you report does seem buggy.
>
> I'm afraid I can't be of further help, but hopefully others will pick up
> on this.
>
> Yours,
> Christian
[O] Clojure Code Block Results not Tabularized, Soapy Smith, 2014/01/28
- Re: [O] Clojure Code Block Results not Tabularized, Christian Moe, 2014/01/29
- Re: [O] Clojure Code Block Results not Tabularized, Soapy Smith, 2014/01/29
- Re: [O] Clojure Code Block Results not Tabularized, Christian Moe, 2014/01/29
- Re: [O] Clojure Code Block Results not Tabularized,
Soapy Smith <=
- Re: [O] Clojure Code Block Results not Tabularized, Eric Schulte, 2014/01/29
- Re: [O] Clojure Code Block Results not Tabularized, Bastien, 2014/01/29
- Re: [O] Clojure Code Block Results not Tabularized, Phill Wolf, 2014/01/29
Re: [O] Clojure Code Block Results not Tabularized, Bastien, 2014/01/30