[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor
From: |
Michael Brand |
Subject: |
Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor |
Date: |
Tue, 20 May 2014 18:26:52 +0200 |
Hi Bastien
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
> Michael Brand <address@hidden> writes:
>> For me it would be already enough and preferred when the increment
>> would be the same as in the two fields above point.
>
> I pushed a change in master for this --
Thank you for implementing this.
> can you please check it works as expected for you?
Yes it does: SHIFT-RET on the last row of the tables
| 2 |
| 5 |
and
| 2 |
and
| [2014-04-30 Wed] |
| [2014-05-07 Wed] |
and
| [2014-04-30 Wed] |
increment as expected.
As I see only now the use case
| 1.1 |
| -0.5 |
does not seem easy to increment by -1.6 due to the formatting of the
result, so I don't expect it to be implemented. (number-to-string is
not enough because of the inaccuracy of the fraction.)
> (const :tag "Don't increment the value when copying a field" t)))
Wasn't the t meant to be nil?
Michael
- Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor, Bastien, 2014/05/20
- Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor,
Michael Brand <=
- Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor, Bastien, 2014/05/20
- Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor, Michael Brand, 2014/05/21
- Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor, Bastien, 2014/05/21
- Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor, Michael Brand, 2014/05/21
- Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor, Bastien, 2014/05/21
- Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor, Michael Brand, 2014/05/21
Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor, Stacey Marshall, 2014/05/30