[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] [RFC] Block switches as #+HEADER: args?

From: Thorsten Jolitz
Subject: Re: [O] [RFC] Block switches as #+HEADER: args?
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:01:29 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)

Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

> Hello,
> Thorsten Jolitz <address@hidden> writes:
>> and at least in the 2nd case the switches are lost, because they don't
>> work as header args:
> [...]
>> #+HEADER: -n
>> Hallo World
>> whats up?
> This is not valid syntax. Switches are to be put on the block line.
> Only header arguments can be put on a #+HEADER line. See
>  (info "(Org) Structure of code blocks")
> in particular the difference between switches and header arguments.

Thats what I thought, but wouldn't it be nicer to treat switches and
header args more uniformly here? E.g allow something like:

#+HEADER: :switches -n
Hallo World
whats up?

Otherwise custom solutions are needed to store the switches in some
place when nuking the surrounding #+begin/#+end lines in a conversion
process, and restore them again when converting back to Org. Or the
switches-info is simply lost during conversion.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]