[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] specifying the coding language resulting from a a :results code

From: Dror Atariah
Subject: Re: [O] specifying the coding language resulting from a a :results code source block
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 09:27:34 +0200

Indeed, this seems to do the trick!

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Ista Zahn <address@hidden> wrote:
Can't you just do

#+begin_src foo :wrap src bar
   hello world



On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Dror Atariah <address@hidden> wrote:
> Is there some change in the status of this issue? Can one now specify the
> language of the result?
> Cheers,
> Dror
> ----------
> Mahalo Tom,
> It looks like that's what I'll be doing for the ruby block.  That said, it
> would be great if the :results code argument would allow a language
> specification.
> Greg
> On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>> Greg Tucker-Kellogg <address@hidden> writes:
>>> I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code.  I'd like to be able
>>> to have the #+RESULTS block enclosed
>>> in a src block that starts "#+BEGIN_SRC dot".  Using :results value
>>> code generates the enclosing SRC block,
>>> but using the same language (Ruby) used to generate the code.  Is
>>> there a way to specify the coding language
>>> of a generated #+RESULTS  src block?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Greg
>> Aloha Greg,
>> This works for me with an emacs-lisp code block named harris-matrix that
>> generates dot code.
>> #+header: :var input=harris-matrix
>> #+header: :file temp.pdf
>> #+header: :cmdline -Tpdf
>> #+header: :results output
>> #+BEGIN_SRC dot
>> $input
>> #+END_SRC
>> It's not quite what you were after, but it might help?
>> All the best,
>> Tom
>> --
>> Thomas S. Dye
>> http://www.tsdye.com

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]