[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Header/preface definitions in ox-taskjuggler?
From: |
John Hendy |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Header/preface definitions in ox-taskjuggler? |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Nov 2014 17:48:40 -0600 |
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 4:09 PM, John Hendy <address@hidden> wrote:
> Edit: sorry about the premature send. Bad accidental tab + enter from
> gmail! Here's the intended email:
> ===
>
> I note that the defaults for a taskjuggler export in Org are as
> follows, with taskjuggler syntax and related org variable definitions
> listed.
[snip]
> In any case, this is the one that's goofing me up. The first task gets
> the following lines prepended to it:
>
> task task1 "task1" {
> purge allocate
> allocate <username>
> ...
> }
>
This is defined in org.git/contrib/ox-taskjuggler.el:
#+begin_src
;; If no resource is allocated among tasks, allocate one to
;; the first task.
(unless (org-element-map main-tasks 'headline
(lambda (task) (org-element-property :ALLOCATE task))
info t)
(org-element-put-property
(car main-tasks) :ALLOCATE
(or (org-taskjuggler-get-id (car main-resources) info)
(user-login-name))))
(mapconcat
(lambda (task) (org-taskjuggler--build-task task info))
main-tasks ""))
#+end_src
Any reason we need to force an allocated resource to the first task?
>From my experience, taskjuggler fails in the following scenarios:
- You use the =effort= attribute and don't assign a resource (effort
is based on available manpower and thus requires a defined resource
with some set availability/output defined)
- You assign a resource but *don't* use =effort= or =length=, which
are allocation-using vs. =duration=, which is not.
In my case, I tend *not* to use =effort= since I'm simply planning out
processes for myself and thus just use =duration=. I've had to create
a dummy first headline to get the allocation so that my actual task
tree doesn't fail due to not using =effort=/=length=. Either that or I
have to edit the generated .tjp file and remove the lines:
#+begin_src
purge allocate
allocate username
#+end_src
Could this be updated to check for both no resources *and* the use of
=effort= to specify a task attribute? If it doesn't have both, there's
no effect in the output of allocating a resource.
Best regards,
John
> If one doesn't use the effort attribute (but duration or length
> instead), you get a warning regarding resources having been requested
> but none being assigned (because effort is the only time-related
> attribute that calls for a person to translate effort into calendar
> length). Is there a reason ox-taskjuggler defaults to
> creating/assigning resources?
>
>
> John