[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [BUG] on export resulting in endless evaluation
From: |
Rainer M Krug |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [BUG] on export resulting in endless evaluation |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:25:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (darwin) |
Sebastien Vauban <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/address@hidden>
writes:
> Rainer M Krug wrote:
>> Charles Berry <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Rainer M Krug <Rainer <at> krugs.de> writes:
>>>>
>>>> when exporting the fillowing org file, I get an endless loop of
>>>> evaluations.
>>>>
>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>>> #+PROPERTY: header-args :exports both
>>>> #+PROPERTY: header-args+ :results output
>>>> * The bug
>>>> This file create an (possibly endless?) loop during export
>>>> * here exports both
>>>> #+begin_src R
>>>> cat(13+14)
>>>> #+end_src
>>>>
>>>> * and here only code
>>>> :PROPERTIES:
>>>> :header-args+: exports code
>>>> :END:
>>>> #+begin_src R
>>>> paste(13+14)
>>>> #+end_src
>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>>
>>> Add this to the end of your example and run the src block:
>>>
>>> #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :results pp
>>> (org-entry-get (point) "header-args" t)
>>> #+END_SRC
>>>
>>> #+RESULTS:
>>> : ":exports both :results output exports code"
>>
>> Very useful function - I think I will use it quite often! I would have
>> seen the problem immediately - the missing :
>
> FWIW, `C-c C-v I' (or `C-c C-v C-I') would show you:
Now this is really helpful.
Brilliant.
Now If I do this in the faulty block, I get:
,----
| Lang: R
| Header Arguments:
| :cache no
| :exports both
| :hlines no
| :noweb no
| :results code exports output replace
| :session none
| :tangle no
`----
And I can see if something is wrong.
One question remains: to debug wrong header arguments, it would be useful to
see, in addition to the resulting header arguments, where they came
from, especially the header-args argument would be useful to see.
So I added the line
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(when header-args (funcall printf "header-args: %s\n" header-args))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
to the output, and was surprised:
Using the second code block in my example, I get (line breaks and bold added for
readability):
,----
| Lang: R
| header-args: ((:comments . ) (:shebang . ) (:cache . no) (:padline . )
| (:noweb . no) (:tangle . no) (:exports . both) (:results . code exports
| output replace) (:hlines . no) (:session . none))
| Header Arguments:
| :cache no
| :exports both
| :hlines no
| :noweb no
| :results code exports output replace
| :session none
| :tangle no
`----
1) I thought that header-args is simply a string, but it already seems
to be a list?
2) Am I right in assuming that when I use header-args, the string passed
is parsed and then either set as header-args or, if using header-args+,
added to the header-args?
3) even when using +, the previously set value *of the header argument* is
overwritten?
4) if an invalid string is given, where is it appended? Woulddn't it
make sense to only accept values of the pattern =:headerArgument string=
to avoid these kind of user errors?
5) Is there any way in getting, in this function, the same output
(header-args) as from the code block suggested by Charles:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :results pp
(org-entry-get (point) "header-args" t)
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS:
: ":exports both :results output exports code"
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Thanks,
Rainer
>
> Lang: R
> Header Arguments:
> :cache no
> :exports code
> :hlines no
> :noweb no
> :results replace
> :session none
> :tangle no
> exports code
>
> Best regards,
> Seb
--
Rainer M. Krug
email: Rainer<at>krugs<dot>de
PGP: 0x0F52F982
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature