Re: [O] ox and links to equation

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:

> I definitely think it is the more proper way to refer to an equation.  But
> it really depends on the document.  E.g. mathtools also offer a set of
> commands for referring to equations.  I was considering an alist of
>
> (DESTINATION-TYPE REF-CMD-WITH-DESCRIPTION REF-CMD-WITHOUT-DESCRIPTION)
>
> But it might be an overkill, especially seeing that mathjax only supports
> \ref and \eqref out of the box.

It really seems overkill. Note that you can write ([[eq1]]), too.

Anyway, you can add another case in `org-latex-link' (fuzzy links part)
if you think it is important to support \eqref.


Regards,