Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal

[Rasmus]

Richard Lawrence <address@hidden> writes:

> You're right that consistency in that syntax would be a good thing.
> Moreover, Org already has syntax that looks a lot like plists in
> #+ATTR_BACKEND lines and in Babel source block headers, so it seems
> natural to adopt something like it for other sorts of objects.

Org also already has [fn:·:·] that already is supported inline and looks
an awful lot like [cite:·:·]. . .

—Rasmus

-- 
Hooray!