[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Publishing on Worg succeeds or fails? -- I can't say!
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Publishing on Worg succeeds or fails? -- I can't say! |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Apr 2015 22:00:18 +0200 |
Fabrice Niessen <fni-news-TA4HMoP+1wHrZ44/address@hidden>
writes:
> Could that be stated clearly in the output?
You should ask to whom implemented Worg.
> The thing is that I did not touch those links, as you can see in my
> commit. So, somehow, Org became more strict. And the fact that that file
> wasn't modified for some time means it wasn't re-exported for the same
> period; hence, the problem was never found -- until someone modifies
> whatever in the file...
Correct.
> IOW, shouldn't all files be published each time, to spot such problems
> as soon as they become problems (because of syntax changes, for
> example), instead of being much later, whenever the file is changed (if
> it ever is)?
So you get 50-100 files to fix instead of the one you modified?
IMO, it would be a waste to re-publish unmodified files. You only have
to consider syntax changes when updating a file.
> OK, I'll see whether it can help.
Note that you need to have a very recent Org (less than 7 hours) to use
it.
Regards,