Re: [O] bisected

emacs-orgmode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] bisected

From:	Bastien
Subject:	Re: [O] bisected
Date:	Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:59:32 +0200
User-agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)

There was a hidden clue the commit could be problematic...

Gregor Zattler <address@hidden> writes:

> First bad commit is:
> bad0409c3b86e09c4559e97d5f394356c6ccbe7f
  ^^^

!

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[O] "not in sub-editing buffer", Detlef Steuer, 2015/04/30
- [O] bisected (was: )Re: "not in sub-editing buffer", Gregor Zattler, 2015/04/30
  - Re: [O] bisected, Bastien <=
    - Re: [O] bisected, Detlef Steuer, 2015/04/30
  - Re: [O] bisected, Nicolas Richard, 2015/04/30
    - Re: [O] bisected, Gregor Zattler, 2015/04/30
    - Re: [O] bisected, Nicolas Richard, 2015/04/30
    - Re: [O] bisected, Gregor Zattler, 2015/04/30
    - [O] wrong test, fix works, sorry (was: Re: bisected), Gregor Zattler, 2015/04/30
    - [O] now it get's ridiculous: bug is still there (was: Re: wrong test, fix works, sorry (was: Re: bisected)), Gregor Zattler, 2015/04/30
- Re: [O] "not in sub-editing buffer", Bastien Guerry, 2015/04/30

Prev by Date: [O] bisected (was: )Re: "not in sub-editing buffer"
Next by Date: Re: [O] Marking/highlighting text temporarily
Previous by thread: [O] bisected (was: )Re: "not in sub-editing buffer"
Next by thread: Re: [O] bisected
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread