emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Bug: org -> org export ignores latex blocks [8.3.4 (8.3.4-50-g83


From: Andrea
Subject: Re: [O] Bug: org -> org export ignores latex blocks [8.3.4 (8.3.4-50-g83e373-elpaplus @ /home/andrea/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160509/)]
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 23:44:05 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1

Okay, I have deleted the org one and left the org-contrib:
I can still use the new feature (probably org-contrib enables it).
Thanks for your explanation,

Andrea

Kaushal Modi <address@hidden> writes:

> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:20 PM Andrea <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I think I saw that, but I did not read it carefully. And since the
>> autocompletion (I mean <l+TAB) still gives me the #+BEGINE_LaTex it did
>> not occur to me that may be the problem.
>>
>> By the way, I did not clone the git repo, so I should be on the master
>> published on ELPA.
>
>
> The versions published on ELPA are from the maint branch of org git.
>
>
>> When I give org-version in emacs I get:
>> Org-mode version 8.3.4 (8.3.4-50-g83e373-elpaplus @
>> /home/andrea/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160509/)
>>
>> On package-list-packages I have
>>
>>   org                20160509      installed             Outline-based
>> notes management and organizer
>>   org-plus-contrib   20160509      installed             Outline-based
>> notes management and organizer
>>
>
> Correct, both are the exact same stable 8.3.x versions; just that
> org-plus-contrib has the packages in contrib/ folder which the other does
> not have.
>
> Also installing just org-plus-contrib should suffice. You do not need to
> install both. If you are not using any package from the contrib/ area (
> http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/tree/contrib/lisp?h=maint ), you
> do not need org-plus-contrib, and you can use just the org package.
>
> But the mystery is still unresolved for me.. why did #+BEGIN_EXPORT syntax
> work for you .. May be someone else more knowledgeable can answer that.
> -- 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]