[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Inquiry about ical2org

From: John Hendy
Subject: Re: [O] Inquiry about ical2org
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 11:06:00 -0500

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Eric S Fraga <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thursday, 26 May 2016 at 20:04, John Hendy wrote:
> [...]
>> Anyway, the point is that the repeater is built if there's any
>> repetition frequency/interval. You also capture the "until" into
>> rrend. So, the first date is going to feature a +unit, and this code
>> adds the end:
>>         else if (rrend != "")
>>             date = date ">--<" rrend
>> I just commented out both sections that add a "-- <date2>", the other
>> checking for time2 being "". Is that the correct way to go about this?
> Well, I would simply not add the end information as org does not
> understand an end date for a repeating item.  In other words, for a
> repeating item I would simply have the start date including the repeat
> directive.

Cool. Commenting has accomplished this for me and I don't get
repeating entries anymore.

>> Out of curiosity, how *is* the rrend code supposed to be handling
>> these? Or what's the use case for building a <date1 +unit>--<date2>?
> I should say that the awk codes have diverged.  My own version now
> differs significantly from what is on Worg, which is where I assume you
> got your copy.  I implemented repeating entries differently, it would
> seem.

Ah, that makes more sense. I was confused about agreeing that an end
date wasn't proper but the code having it. Is your original version
anywhere handy? I tried searching but don't seem to find it.


> HTH,
> eric
> --
> : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs, Org release_8.3.4-869-gf2c421

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]