[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] export of src block ignores :results

From: Thomas Alexander Gerds
Subject: Re: [O] export of src block ignores :results
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:06:16 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux)

thanks for looking into this. it would be great if the regexp could be
changed to catch the show-time variant. the regexp you sent in your
previous mail works for me, i.e., the result of
(progn (looking-at org-babel-result-regexp)(match-string 1))
is the same with and without the show-time option.

anyway, the original problem is not solved yet.
org-babel-current-result-hash is related to the execution of the src
block which is independent of the export process since I have

(setq org-export-babel-evaluate nil). 

and the problem that the results are exported in case of ":results code"
persists when I set (setq org-babel-hash-show-time nil)

so, unfortunately my question remains. which function in the export
process interprets the "results code" option?


"Charles C. Berry" <address@hidden> writes:

> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, Charles C. Berry wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, Thomas Alexander Gerds wrote:
>>> Hi Chuck
>>> thanks for checking. my org-version is the same
>>> release_8.3.6-1178-g2b22d5
>>> to get the date and time of the in the results:
>>> (setq org-babel-hash-show-time t)
>>> but even without this option the results of the block are exported
>>> no matter what. could someone point to the place in the export
>>> process where the :results option is interpreted?
>> You probably want `org-babel-current-result-hash', which AFAICS does
>> not recognize the `show-time' variant.
>> I think you'll need some regexp magic to make it work.
> You might try this:
> #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
>    (setq org-babel-result-regexp
>       (concat
>        "^[    ]*#\\+RESULTS\\[\\(?:<[0-9]"
>        "\\{4\\}-[0-9]\\{2\\}-[0-9]\\{2\\} ?"
>        "[0-2][0-9]:[0-6][0-9]:[0-6][0-9]> ?"
>        "[^
> \n[:alnum:]]*\\)?\\([[:alnum:]]+\\)"
>        "\\]?:[        ]*"))
> The line wrap after "[^ is due to C-M (you type C-q C-M to insert it
> if your email client messes with it and you need to redo it)
> This seems like an innocuous change, but I haven't yet run this thru
> `make test' so beware.
> Chuck

Thomas A. Gerds -- Department of Biostatistics Copenhagen
University of Copenhagen, Oester Farimagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen,

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]