[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[O] Bug: clock comments [9.0.2 (9.0.2-elpaplus @ c:/USR/FJM/APP/.emacs.d

From: Francis J. Monari, Esquire
Subject: [O] Bug: clock comments [9.0.2 (9.0.2-elpaplus @ c:/USR/FJM/APP/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20161214/)] {response to question}
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:00:12 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0

Thank you for the prompt response

I would like all "clock" entries - with associated notes - in the CLOCK
drawer.  With org version 9 time goes to the CLOCK drawer, note goes to
the LOGBOOK drawer.

I would like all other "logbook" entries - separate entries are possible
- in the LOGBOOK drawer.

Segregating the "clock" and "logbook" entries makes drawer easier to
read for my purposes.

In version 8 org behaved in this manner.

Is it possible to retain this behavior?



On 1/18/2017 4:39 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
> "Francis J. Monari, Esquire" <address@hidden> writes:
>> Using Clock Mode to track time.
>> Org Mode starts and stops clock.  Clock entry redirected to CLOCK
>> drawer.
>> I expect to see the clock entry (time & note) appear in CLOCK drawer.
>> What happens is that clock time goes to CLOCK drawer, clock note goes to
>> LOGBOOK drawer.
>> This allocation does not make sense.  Time is properly tracked, but no
>> ability to identify activity.
>> org mode clock variables follow:
>> ;;;Org clock settings
>> (add-hook 'org-clock-in-prepare-hook 'org-resolve-clocks)
>> (setq org-clock-history-length 32)
>> (setq org-clock-idle-time 20)
>> (setq org-clock-in-resume t)
>> (setq org-clock-into-drawer "CLOCK")
> Why do you specify a different drawer name if you want notes and clocks
> in the same one?
> Regards,

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]