Re: [O] [RFC] The "c" Org macro

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:

> Seems fine.  To me, "n" or "N" would be a better name for the macro, as
> that suggests some sort of number, whereas "c" doesn’t really associated
> with "counter" to me.  Perhaps it’s just because the syntax looks a lot
> like the R combine command...

"n" seems better indeed. Not sure about "N"

> Are there a lot of cases where it would not be able to just configure how
> heading numbers are printed in the backend?

I don't know there are a lot of cases, but there are definitely some:

  * Definition
  * Property
  * Example 1
  * Property
  * Example 2

then you realize you want to demonstrate the second property before the
first one...

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou