[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: issue tracker?
From: |
James R Miller |
Subject: |
Re: issue tracker? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 May 2020 13:50:26 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-464-g810d66a-fmstable-20200518v1 |
So, I definitely agree that using Github / Gitlab does expose you to tracking
messes and that is something to shun. I figured a self-hosted Gogs instance
(which is already being hosted at https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode) would
fix the "tracking" issue.
I think an actual issue tracker has merit to large projects.
And I don't think simply saying "we've always done it through a ML" or "$FOO
project is bigger than us and uses a ML" is good enough. $FOO project may very
well increase efficiency, code quality, and/or participation by implementing an
issue tracker.
A project to consider then, might be some sort of system that interfaces with
the ML (as well as a simple REST api so that issues could be submitted from
inside emacs directly), that creates some sort of org-based issue tracker, and
then ox-html exports to a static web page or pages.
--
James Miller
address@hidden
- Re: issue tracker?, (continued)
- Re: issue tracker?, Bruce D'Arcus, 2020/05/19
- Re: issue tracker?, Timothy, 2020/05/19
- Re: issue tracker?, Russell Adams, 2020/05/19
- Re: issue tracker?, Timothy, 2020/05/19
- Re: issue tracker?, Russell Adams, 2020/05/19
- Re: issue tracker?,
James R Miller <=
- Re: issue tracker?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2020/05/19
- Re: issue tracker?, Roland Everaert, 2020/05/19
- Re: issue tracker?, Diego Zamboni, 2020/05/19
- Re: issue tracker?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2020/05/19
- Re: issue tracker?, Russell Adams, 2020/05/19
- Re: issue tracker?, Trey Ethan Harris, 2020/05/19
- Re: issue tracker?, gyro funch, 2020/05/19
- Re: issue tracker?, James R Miller, 2020/05/19
- Re: issue tracker?, Eric S Fraga, 2020/05/20
- Re: issue tracker?, Detlef Steuer, 2020/05/20