Re: `with` as a list.

[Mario Frasca]

On 30/05/2020 09:23, Mario Frasca wrote:

> > The code above
> >         looks fine to me.  Another option would be to use
> >         
> >         number-sequence and then filter out the ind value.
> >         
> >       
>       
>       no, that would break functionality: I need to keep the given
>       order.
>       
>     
    ah, no, sorry, you are totally right here.  I'll see if using
    number-sequence makes the code shorter.