[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] ob-java
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] ob-java |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:45:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Jarmo,
Jarmo Hurri <jarmo.hurri@iki.fi> writes:
> (I wonder if it would be possible to have timestamps in worg. I have
> bumped into situations before where I have not known the temporal
> relationship between worg documentation and current org version.)
Good point. I think worg documentation, when related to a specific
Org feature, should mention the Org version it relates to, rather than
a timestamp. As an additional info, the timestamp is good, but not
enough.
Let's try to follow this convention from now on.
--
Bastien
- Re: [PATCH] ob-java, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] ob-java, ian martins, 2020/11/05
- Re: [PATCH] ob-java, Jarmo Hurri, 2020/11/06
- Re: [PATCH] ob-java, Jarmo Hurri, 2020/11/10
- Re: [PATCH] ob-java, Jarmo Hurri, 2020/11/14
- Re: [PATCH] ob-java, ian martins, 2020/11/14
- Re: [PATCH] ob-java, Jarmo Hurri, 2020/11/14
- Re: [PATCH] ob-java, ian martins, 2020/11/17
- Re: [PATCH] ob-java,
Bastien <=