[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: did behaviour of RET change again?
|
From: |
Kyle Meyer |
|
Subject: |
Re: did behaviour of RET change again? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 22 Dec 2020 15:36:46 GMT |
Bastien writes:
> Also, I'm thinking of using headline-data as the new default for the
> org-adapt-indentation option. WDYT?
FWIW if we're going to change the default, I'd vote for the simpler and
longer-existing nil value.
- did behaviour of RET change again?, Eric S Fraga, 2020/12/18
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Pankaj Jangid, 2020/12/18
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Berry, Charles, 2020/12/18
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Bastien, 2020/12/20
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Gustavo Barros, 2020/12/20
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Eric S Fraga, 2020/12/21
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Eric S Fraga, 2020/12/21
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Kévin Le Gouguec, 2020/12/21
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?,
Kyle Meyer <=
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Samuel Wales, 2020/12/22
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Samuel Wales, 2020/12/22
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Tom Gillespie, 2020/12/23
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Greg Minshall, 2020/12/23
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Tom Gillespie, 2020/12/24
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Devin Prater, 2020/12/25