Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor

[Denis Maier]

Am 19.05.2021 um 17:23 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:

> > \cite could be [cite/bare: ...]
>
> This would be confusing. So far, "bare" is a style variant. Your
> suggestion promotes it exceptionally to a full-fledged style. It hurts
> my logic. :)

> Could "\cite" be [cite/parens/bare:...] instead?

Another thought here:
Yes, it could be [cite/parens/bare:...] but also [cite/note/bare:...].

@Bruce: We don't have bare citation in CSL currently, right? Perhaps we 
 should add this to add some portability...

Denis