[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [org-cite, oc-csl] print_bibliography options
From: |
Bruce D'Arcus |
Subject: |
Re: [org-cite, oc-csl] print_bibliography options |
Date: |
Sat, 29 May 2021 12:03:51 -0400 |
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 11:15 AM Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> Bibliography is printed using "\printbibliography" command. Additional
> >> options may be passed to it through a property list attached to the
> >> "print_bibliography" keyword. E.g.,
> >>
> >> #+print_bibliography: :section 2 :heading subbibliography
>
> > I don't believe citeproc-el currently supports any of these features,
> > and it looks like the citeproc-el API doesn't even have an optional
> > parameter to put details like these.
> >
> > As a consequence, if one adds an example like the above, so that one
> > has two print_bibliography lines, one will get two, duplicate
> > bibliography lists outside of oc-biblatex.
>
> I don't understand how you reach that consequence… If the citation
> processor does not understand the properties, it simply ignores them,
> but obeys to "print_bibliography" directive anyhow.
>
> Have you tried it? I'm not sure to understand your concern.
Yes.
I think we're saying the same thing, but maybe I need to clarify the
implications better?
See below.
Let me illustrate with a full example, where the @einstein entry has a
"keyword" field of "primary."
The use case is a user wanting a bibliography with two sections, which
is a common case for this feature.
Note that I am unsure of the exact invocation to achieve this with
biblatex (as in, it's probably wrong), but I don't think that matters
to illustrate the point.
>>>>>
#+language: en
#+bibliography: test.bib
#+cite_export: csl
1. simple: [cite:@latexcompanion]
2. primary source: [cite:@einstein]
3. affixes: [cite/text:see @latexcompanion chapter 2 p.23]
4. quote, punctuation: “my quote” [cite/text/caps:@latexcompanion].
* Bibliography
** Primary Sources
#+print_bibliography: :keyword primary :title "Primary Sources"
** Secondary Sources
#+print_bibliography: :title "Secondary Source"
<<<<<
Here's the output from oc-csl:
>>>>>
1. simple: (Goossens, Mittelbach, and Samarin 1993)
2. primary source: (Einstein 1905)
3. affixes: (see Goossens, Mittelbach, and Samarin 1993, chaps. 2 p.23)
4. quote, punctuation: “my quote” (Goossens, Mittelbach, and Samarin
1993).
1 Bibliography
══════════════
1.1 Primary Sources
───────────────────
Einstein, Albert. 1905. “Zur Elektrodynamik Bewegter Körper. (German)
[on the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies].” /Annalen Der Physik/ 322
(10):891–921.
Goossens, Michel, Frank Mittelbach, and Alexander Samarin. 1993. /The
LaTeX Companion/. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
1.2 Secondary Sources
─────────────────────
Einstein, Albert. 1905. “Zur Elektrodynamik Bewegter Körper. (German)
[on the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies].” /Annalen Der Physik/ 322
(10):891–921.
Goossens, Michel, Frank Mittelbach, and Alexander Samarin. 1993. /The
LaTeX Companion/. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
<<<<<
So two duplicate lists.
Does that clarify?
The other common case I am familiar with is a bibliography per section
of a document.
It may not be practical to do anything other than current behavior,
but I was hoping some biblatex experts might have some thoughts.
And, of course, wanting to flag this for András to think about, since
ideally citeproc-el would support this.
Bruce
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, (continued)
[org-cite, oc-csl] print_bibliography options, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/29
- Re: [org-cite, oc-csl] print_bibliography options, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/05/29
- Re: [org-cite, oc-csl] print_bibliography options,
Bruce D'Arcus <=
- Re: [org-cite, oc-csl] print_bibliography options, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/05/29
- Re: [org-cite, oc-csl] print_bibliography options, András Simonyi, 2021/05/31
- Re: [org-cite, oc-csl] print_bibliography options, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/31