[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] Re: Subject: Bug: Org-Clock-Out in indirect buffer error after r
[PATCH] Re: Subject: Bug: Org-Clock-Out in indirect buffer error after refile [9.3 (release_9.3 @ /usr/share/emacs/27.1/lisp/org/)]
Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:23:59 +0800
Eddie Drury <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I have followed those steps and that is the same behaviour I get.
> The expected behaviour is for it to clock out of the subtree, instead of
> giving the "Clock start time is gone" error.
I can also reproduce. The fix is attached.
>From 4ad92b3efc8717e3ca871ab83bcb5e23e8faeb35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ihor Radchenko <email@example.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:16:02 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix not updating org-clock-marker after refiling from
* lisp/org.el (org-check-and-save-marker): Save markers in base buffer
of indirect buffer in addition to markers in current buffer.
Fixes bug reported in
lisp/org.el | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lisp/org.el b/lisp/org.el
index eca12a5e7..53fd5b7c7 100644
@@ -7877,7 +7877,8 @@ (defun org-check-and-save-marker (marker beg end)
"Check if MARKER is between BEG and END.
If yes, remember the marker and the distance to BEG."
(when (and (marker-buffer marker)
- (equal (marker-buffer marker) (current-buffer))
+ (or (equal (marker-buffer marker) (current-buffer))
+ (equal (marker-buffer marker) (buffer-base-buffer
(>= marker beg) (< marker end))
(push (cons marker (- marker beg)) org-markers-to-move)))