[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration ::
From: |
Vincent Breton |
Subject: |
Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:08:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 |
Hi,
Org mode needs to have his pdf documentation on the official web page
of documentation : https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/org.html
How much time for example to copy http://www.presentiel.com/org/org.pdf
file on the official web site for gnu documentation, or if you prefer
to generate it again using sources?
In my opinion the link
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/index.html is
not appropriate and must be changed to
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/emacs.html in the web
documentation page of Emacs. People must have the choice to choose
easily the format of files to read when possible and not be forced to be
oriented with or forced to use HTML format
Design web site musn't reduce the access of documentation of products
to different formats. A direct link to manuals to differents formats
must be provided and others formats musn't be neglated, more
particularly when tools integrates sources and options to generate them.
Yes, separate site is good but it don't forget a easy and direct link to
the official doc to different formats...
Vincent
On 06/12/2021 20:45, Karl Voit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Now, we need to understand what kind of people may be looking to
>> orgmode.org website.
>>
>> 1. Existing emacs users
>> 2. Non-emacs users interested in plain text markup
>> 3. Non-emacs users interested in GTD/project management, etc
>> "Org mode: your life in plain text" is somewhat relevant when people
>> are looking to manage "life" (typically true for GTD enthusiasts).
>> 4. Researchers looking for ipython-like environment
>> 5. ??? (Suggestions are welcome)
> I don't think that you can come up with a good website that is able
> to serve all of them properly.
>
> For Orgdown I had in mind number 2 and 3. For supporting the idea
> for Orgdown, I thought of number 1. (Well, that turned out in a
> mixed way[1]).
>
> If you do want to have a go-to for people who should use the
> Org-mode syntax without the GNU/Emacs tool, you need to have a
> separate site.
>
> [1] https://karl-voit.at/2021/12/02/Orgdown-feedback
>
- Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, (continued)
- Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, M . ‘quintus’ Gülker, 2021/12/06
- Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, Russell Adams, 2021/12/06
- Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, Timothy, 2021/12/06
- Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, Russell Adams, 2021/12/06
- Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, Timothy, 2021/12/06
- Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, Russell Adams, 2021/12/06
- Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, Gerry Agbobada, 2021/12/06
- Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, Ihor Radchenko, 2021/12/08
- Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, Greg Minshall, 2021/12/06
- Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, Karl Voit, 2021/12/06
- Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal,
Vincent Breton <=
- Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, Ihor Radchenko, 2021/12/08
- Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, Ihor Radchenko, 2021/12/08
Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, Tim Cross, 2021/12/05
Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, Timothy, 2021/12/05
Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, Max Nikulin, 2021/12/06
Re: Concrete suggestions to improve Org mode third-party integration :: an afterthought following Karl Voit's Orgdown proposal, Russell Adams, 2021/12/06