[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0

From: Bruce D'Arcus
Subject: Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 17:53:06 -0400

On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 5:27 PM Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
> Dominik Schrempf <dominik.schrempf@gmail.com> writes:
> > (add-to-list ’org-cite-biblatex-styles ’(“full” nil “fullcite” nil nil))
> >
> > (This or something similar should be added upstream).
> I can add it, but "full" is already the name of a variant, so
> [cite/full: ...] and [cite/style/full: ...] would mean different things.
> Is this a problem, or do you think of a better style name?

FWIW, Nicolas, biblatex "fullcite" is equivalent to natbib/bibtex "bibentry".

That might be a reasonable alternative style name?

> Also, are there possible variants for this style?

AFAIK, no.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]