[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0

From: Nicolas Goaziou
Subject: Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 23:04:42 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)


"Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com> writes:

> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 5:27 PM Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> 
> wrote:

>> I can add it, but "full" is already the name of a variant, so
>> [cite/full: ...] and [cite/style/full: ...] would mean different things.
>> Is this a problem, or do you think of a better style name?
> FWIW, Nicolas, biblatex "fullcite" is equivalent to natbib/bibtex "bibentry".
> That might be a reasonable alternative style name?
>> Also, are there possible variants for this style?
> AFAIK, no.

Hmm, OK. What about:

  (“fullcite” nil “fullcite” nil nil)


Nicolas Goaziou

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]