[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite
From: |
Bruce D'Arcus |
Subject: |
Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jul 2022 08:05:39 -0400 |
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 7:25 AM <Alain.Cochard@unistra.fr> wrote:
> As I do not know which of these alternatives
>
> - it is normal, this feature should not be there,
> - it is an oversight,
> - this feature is not implemented yet,
I believe this is the answer, and it's arguable (I have no opinion,
and could see reasonable arguments either way) whether a "basic"
processor should support it?
The parsebib library, which most third party packages use (for
org-cite, there's my citar), does support this feature.
> - it does not work for me for some reason,
> - other,
Bruce
- @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite, Alain . Cochard, 2022/07/08
- Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite,
Bruce D'Arcus <=
- Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/07/08
- Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite, András Simonyi, 2022/07/09
- Can citeproc be installed without using MELPA? (was: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/07/10
- Re: Can citeproc be installed without using MELPA? (was: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite), Joost Kremers, 2022/07/10
- Re: Can citeproc be installed without using MELPA? (was: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/07/10
- Re: Can citeproc be installed without using MELPA? (was: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite), András Simonyi, 2022/07/12
Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [and a minimal working example with natbib], Alain . Cochard, 2022/07/09