[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: section continuation
From: |
Max Nikulin |
Subject: |
Re: section continuation |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Dec 2022 19:47:32 +0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 |
On 28/12/2022 03:22, abq@bitrot.link wrote:
Second, did I cover all the necessary changes to make
section-continuation generally useful? I.e.
Skip folding of lone-dash sections when folding all the sections at
their level.
Unfold them when unfolding the containing section.
Skip them when jumping to next/previous section.
Skip numbering them.
Display them at one level shallower than currently standard in
org-indent-mode.
- Various operations with subtrees: kill, yank, refile
- Getting refile/goto targets
and perhaps more functions spread over Org .el files. That is why it is
hardly viable as a 3rd party extension.
It still would be a tree, but with interleaved block-level text elements
and subheadings, while currently subheadings must follow heading text.
What is more close to graph is org-transclusion.
Certainly more liberal structure may confuse readers. It has advantages
for early drafts and notes more close to mind maps. During collection of
notes it can not be anticipated which peace of information will be
expanded with a lot of details. Before publishing document should be
reworked to make it more linear.
HTML documents may be more interactive and have more decorations than
printed papers, so I am unsure concerning the export common denominator
argument. There is a variant of continue parent section for poors:
create a 1 level deeper subsection "<title> (continued)".
I am still in doubts if increased complexity and performance impact
outweigh benefits.
- Re: section continuation, (continued)
- Re: section continuation, abq, 2022/12/27
- Re: section continuation, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/12/28
- Re: section continuation, tomas, 2022/12/28
- Re: section continuation, Tim Cross, 2022/12/29
- Re: section continuation, tomas, 2022/12/29
- Re: section continuation, Heinz Tuechler, 2022/12/29
- Re: section continuation, tomas, 2022/12/29
- Re: section continuation, Jean Louis, 2022/12/29
- Re: section continuation, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/12/29
- Re: section continuation, Jean Louis, 2022/12/29
- Re: section continuation,
Max Nikulin <=
Re: section continuation, Timothy, 2022/12/28
Re: section continuation, Heinz Tuechler, 2022/12/28