emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [POLL] Should we accept breaking changes to get rid of Org libraries


From: Ihor Radchenko
Subject: Re: [POLL] Should we accept breaking changes to get rid of Org libraries that perform side effects when loading?
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 09:16:14 +0000

Russell Adams <RLAdams@adamsinfoserv.com> writes:

> Do we have a concrete summary of individual features that inline tasks
> have?
>
> I'm hearing exempt from folding, and support for drawers/heading
> items.
>
> What else?

Well. Everything normal headings have, except things that cannot be done
the same way due to inlinetasks being surrounded by non-headline
elements.

In particular, export cannot be made the same - "inline" sections are
meaningless in most export backends, like latex or odt. Instead,
inlinetasks are exported as a kind of minipage/box.

Also, folding of inlinetasks is handled like folding of drawers/blocks -
separately from subtree cycling.

Similar story for M-<up>/<down> - handled like drawers/blocks.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]