[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks
|
From: |
Russell Adams |
|
Subject: |
Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks |
|
Date: |
Sat, 26 Aug 2023 20:01:16 +0200 |
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 05:31:46PM +0000, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
> *************** TODO anonsec :tag:
> Content that has neither a title nor a section number.
> *************** END
>
> and a construction that for the purposes of parceling out the text
> behaves like a section. The problem is the LaTeX side. Since there is no
> support for anonymous sections in LaTeX (I seem to remember that some
> special class like Koma had some command to introduce anonymous breaks,
> but I only use the standard classes), I had to define an environment. It
> is not inconvenient, since after all what appears in LaTeX is the
> typographical result. For the Org side I can use TODO keywords, tags,
> deadlines, etc.
Why not just put the TODO heading in a code block with type org?
Then you get all the toys, ignored by the main file.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Russell Adams RLAdams@AdamsInfoServ.com
https://www.adamsinfoserv.com/
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, (continued)
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Juan Manuel Macías, 2023/08/26
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/26
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Juan Manuel Macías, 2023/08/26
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/26
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Juan Manuel Macías, 2023/08/26
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/26
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Juan Manuel Macías, 2023/08/26
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/27
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Juan Manuel Macías, 2023/08/27
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/31
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks,
Russell Adams <=
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Russell Adams, 2023/08/29
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Alain . Cochard, 2023/08/30
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Russell Adams, 2023/08/30
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Alain . Cochard, 2023/08/30
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Russell Adams, 2023/08/30
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Alain . Cochard, 2023/08/30
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Russell Adams, 2023/08/30
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Russell Adams, 2023/08/30
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/30
- Re: [POLL] Should we accept breaking changes to get rid of Org libraries that perform side effects when loading?, Russell Adams, 2023/08/24