Re: Provide org-insert-subitem

[Adam Porter]

Hi Bastien,

> I think that's a good idea to promote org-insert-subheading either by
> binding it to a key or another way.
>
> I already have some drafty code that might touch things in this (very
> sensible) area, so if you don't mind, I'll come back to the details of
> your suggestions when I can articulate them with the few ideas I have
> in mind.  And after 9.4 is out.
>
> But yes, there is room for enhancements here.
>
> Don't hesitate to bump this thread in a few weeks if I don't share my
> ideas since then.

Well, it's been a few years since I forgot to bump this thread. [0]  :) 
I just rediscovered it after wondering why the command 
org-insert-subheading still doesn't have a default binding.  May we 
revisit this?  I find myself wanting to insert a subheading almost every 
day, and I have to "M-x org-insert-subheading RET".

Of course I could bind it myself, and in one of my configs I have, but I 
still think it deserves a default binding, even if it were to be a 
"smart" command that worked like org-table-copy-down when in a table and 
does org-insert-subheading otherwise (because I still think that "S-RET" 
is an obviously appropriate binding for this command).

What do you think?  =)

Thanks,
Adam

0: https://yhetil.org/orgmode/875zg9trjo.fsf@bzg.fr/