[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DISCUSSION] What should we do with undocumented x^(superscript insi
|
From: |
Thomas Dye |
|
Subject: |
Re: [DISCUSSION] What should we do with undocumented x^(superscript inside /round/ braces) syntax? (was: Subscript with parenthesis) |
|
Date: |
Sat, 17 Feb 2024 10:03:51 -1000 |
+1
Tom
> On Feb 17, 2024, at 9:38 AM, William Denton <william@williamdenton.org> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, February 17th, 2024 at 07:07, Ihor Radchenko
> <yantar92@posteo.net> wrote:
>
>> I tentatively propose to remove the x^(2-i) example from the docstring
>> and mark the ^(...) syntax deprecated.
>>
>> WDYT?
>
> I think it's very sensible. It's surprising ^(...) works like this, and if
> anyone was using it (perhaps by accident) it will be easy to change when
> necessary.
>
>
> Bill
>
> --
> William Denton
> https://www.miskatonic.org/
> Librarian, artist and licensed private investigator.
> Toronto, Canada
>
>